This makes it harder for me, someone with a keen interest in science, to understand this crap and, more importantly, determine the veracity of the claims within it.

But of course, American scientists don't know how to write for a wide-ranging audience. They want to look smart. https://twitter.com/UltimateBeing01/status/1319475232458027008
When it comes to science and mathematics, avoid the laymen online, weekly periodicals or "experts" on social media. These sources, oftentimes, promote opinions disguised as facts, make errors, or purposely mislead people. They are more interested in money than teaching.
Yes, when I say "laymen online" that includes even myself. Though, to any interested reader, I will tell you upfront what I'm uncertain of, recommend who I personally think can be trusted to give you the facts on a science or social issue and try to be correct.
I'm fully aware I make mistakes and don't have perfect knowledge of anything. That's why I still refer to myself as a STUDENT of science and politics.
As far as published studies, there's many to wade through and many of them have NOT been reviewed and vetted for accuracy. These papers can often have damaging effects when the public uses them to make decisions.

That said, now is a good time to discuss the NEJM's mask article.
(Will cont. this thread later on.)
You can follow @UltimateBeing01.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: