Read on Twitter
These two modern odalisques are equally artificial, using essentially the same range of surgical techniques and makeup. But the girl on the left gives a very "artificial" impression, while the girl on the right seems "natural."
The difference is in the execution, not whether
The difference is in the execution, not whether
they technically did or didn't use artificial means.
The result counts more than the methods, and good results often CONCEAL the methods. https://twitter.com/surrealSanilac/status/1315070822336196608
The result counts more than the methods, and good results often CONCEAL the methods. https://twitter.com/surrealSanilac/status/1315070822336196608
In this case I suspect she INTENTIONALLY wanted to look artificial, which some men (and women) seem to like, so she played up the artificial elements of her look. https://twitter.com/deplurabel/status/1319401232499396613
Whenever I use the photo on the upper right I link the before and after photos, because without seeing them, no one believes it's not real.
This thread has become popular in Brazil (...!?) mostly in defense of the model on the left.
I didn't say the model on the left was ugly, only overtly artificial. Some like that; I personally prefer that the hallmarks of artificiality be more concealed.
I didn't say the model on the left was ugly, only overtly artificial. Some like that; I personally prefer that the hallmarks of artificiality be more concealed.
