Read on Twitter
[THREAD]
1/ Apparently, some high-follower lefty Twitter accounts have gotten upset about two of my tweets, including the one below.
But the 135-to-115 IQ comparison seems about right to me based upon standard race IQ distributions. (See chart.)
Let me explain. https://twitter.com/a_centrism/status/1319077865821032448">https://twitter.com/a_centris...
![[THREAD]1/ Apparently, some high-follower lefty Twitter accounts have gotten upset about two of my tweets, including the one below.But the 135-to-115 IQ comparison seems about right to me based upon standard race IQ distributions. (See chart.)Let me explain. https://twitter.com/a_centris...](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ek524TAXIAIzP2k.jpg "[THREAD]1/ Apparently, some high-follower lefty Twitter accounts have gotten upset about two of my tweets, including the one below.But the 135-to-115 IQ comparison seems about right to me based upon standard race IQ distributions. (See chart.)Let me explain. https://twitter.com/a_centris...")
1/ Apparently, some high-follower lefty Twitter accounts have gotten upset about two of my tweets, including the one below.
But the 135-to-115 IQ comparison seems about right to me based upon standard race IQ distributions. (See chart.)
Let me explain. https://twitter.com/a_centrism/status/1319077865821032448">https://twitter.com/a_centris...
2/ Let& #39;s say that to be a public intellectual one needs to be in the top one percent of your group& #39;s IQ distribution.
That means that whites need to have an IQ of about 135 (see chart in previous tweet), and blacks about 120.
That means that whites need to have an IQ of about 135 (see chart in previous tweet), and blacks about 120.
3/ So the "guess-timates" I made in my original tweet turned out to be pretty accurate, even though the tweet wasn& #39;t really intended to be all that serious.
