Read on Twitter
Yesterday I attended the first online event of @LabWomenDec - Labour Women's Declaration. The speakers were uniformly excellent, incisive, in complete control of their topics, lucid, articulate and good-humoured. Today I watched the @Womans_Place_UK session on the proposed .../1
... guidelines for the sex question in next year's census. Ably chaired by @selina_todd, it featured Lisa MacKenzie, Dr Clare Jones and Prof. Alice Sullivan. Again, all thoroughly well-versed in their fields, presenting cogent arguments against what appears to be a .../2
... concerted attempt to ensure that the question conflates sex and gender in a way that undermines the primary purpose of collecting such data. You can watch the former at http://labourwomensdeclaration.org.uk/ soon and the latter at now. .../3
All very inspiring. But what struck me is that, although I see many such expert, well-informed women (and some men) presenting arguments backed up by evidence, never accompanied by any abuse or threats, I have yet to see anything approaching this .../4
... level of sophistication from the transactivist side.
So my question is this - and it's a genuine, honest one: where are the people who can put transactivist arguments in a thorough, evidenced and rational way? If no such people exist, what explains the .../5
So my question is this - and it's a genuine, honest one: where are the people who can put transactivist arguments in a thorough, evidenced and rational way? If no such people exist, what explains the .../5
... large-scale institutional capture of organisations as diverse as governmental departments, universities, companies and the police?
Perhaps they do exist, and I've missed them. Let's see.
Perhaps they do exist, and I've missed them. Let's see.
