Malegon Blast 2008 case is moving at snails pace.
Pray, why?
Bhakts may gleefully give a know all smile with twinkle in their eyes. Leftists, Congis, Christo-Islamists, fake liberals & pseudo secularists may accuse Modi - Shah.
But the truth is bitter & painful.

Everyone knows that ATS Mumbai submitted their charge sheet against 11 accused on 20 Jan 2009.

NIA took over further investigation on 13 Apr 2011 & submitted its supplementary charge sheet on 13 May 2016 exonerating prime accused Sadhvi Pragya.

On 27 Dec 2017, Special NIA Judge SD Tekale dropped MCOCA, discharged 5 accused & ordered framing of charges against Sadhvi Pragya, Major Upadhyay, Sameer Kulkarni, Ajay Rahirkar, Prasad Purohit, Sudhakar Dhar Dwivedi & Sudhakar Chaturvedi.

Applicability of UAPA had already been challenged in Bombay High Court vide Cri. Writ Petition No. 1124 of 2019.
Meanwhile, Sadhvi Pragya, Prasad Purohit, Sameer Kulkarni went to Bombay HC seeking discharge.
Hon'ble High Court clubbed all matters together & it is pending.

Lt Col Prasad Purohit again approached Bombay HC separately for discharge on the grounds that govt hasn't sanctioned his prosecution till date

Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi argued for Purohit

Matter is pending

That the case is a frame up is old news. That ATS charge sheet was debunked by NIA is also known. But the learned Special Court still went ahead to order framing of charges. On what basis?
Answer is : On the basis of 164 CrPC statements.

Myself & Sameer Kulkarni wanted to see it. We sought the original 164 CrPC statements for verification.
To our horror, we found that the original records are missing.
https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/mumbai/cover-story/key-witness-statements-in-malegaon-blasts-case-missing-from-nia-court/amp_articleshow/51721908.cms#aoh=16031787755284&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s

Court staff mounted a search but to no avail. Buck passing continued. Documents couldn't be traced.

Special NIA Court allowed Xerox copies of 164 CrPC statements of prosecution witnesses as secondary evidence against the accused. This was Jan 2017 & the basis for his order dated 27 Dec 2017 for framing of charges.

Since the accused, prosecutor, defence lawyers or the Hon'ble judge himself had not seen the 164 CrPC statements of the prosecution witnesses which were in sealed envelopes & gone missing from Court records, the impunged order to use copies as secondary evidence was challenged.

Hon'ble Bombay High Court asked NIA how it verified photocopies of the evidence

Unsatisfied with the reply of the prosecution, Hon'ble Bombay HC stayed the execution & òperation of the impugned order allowing the use of secondary evidence in the trial

So, as the matter stands today, there is no credible evidence with the prosecution to proceed against the accused in Malegaon Blast 2008 case.
It's egg on the faces of ATS Mumbai all over which framed the accused.
Ultimately the innocent accused will get acquitted.
I

However, it's a slow, painful process in which wheels of justice is moving in Malegaon case.

We, the accused are suffering since last 12 yrs.

Since Hindus hv no Mai - Baap in India that is Bharat, it is a lonely battle of each on his own.

Satyameva Jayate !

Jai Hind !

@threader_app Compile