Read on Twitter
As frequent @djangocon speaker and a @django Software Foundation member, I have weird feelings about the Django CoC being listed as an inspiration for this. https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/1318357948867866624">https://twitter.com/brian_arm...
For one thing, there seems to be a pretty clear founder exemption in Mission Protocol
"project leaders have the responsibility to clarify and interpret the mission, as well as the intentions and standards in this code of conduct, in order to maintain mission focus."
"project leaders have the responsibility to clarify and interpret the mission, as well as the intentions and standards in this code of conduct, in order to maintain mission focus."
Compare this to the @djangoproject CoC which states:
"This code applies equally to founders"
https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/ ">https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/&...
"This code applies equally to founders"
https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/ ">https://www.djangoproject.com/conduct/&...
Additionally, the reporting guidelines are pretty sparse. There& #39;s a large onus on the reporter, and the project founder gets final say in all issues.
This is, of course, de facto how a lot of projects are run.
It& #39;s also a great way to make sure that your contributors look and think only like you, which does not a healthy project make.
It& #39;s also a great way to make sure that your contributors look and think only like you, which does not a healthy project make.
My receipts here are being on the PSF Conduct WG for almost 3 years, and seeing what happens when there& #39;s a cut-out in conduct work for people at the top.
