Read on Twitter
This is a neat concept of a website encouraging more nuanced reasoned debate between two people: https://www.pairagraph.com/dialogue/354c72095d2f42dab92bf42726d785ff/1
I'm not sure about the way it's been executed. It's a bit more difficult to navigate than I think it needs to be. Or perhaps the format with a hard break lends itself to implying your argument must end and be reasoned? Unsure.
Would be interested how @pairagraph could expand this to include sources, as they're targeting "notable individuals."
It could be a fun/great resource for students and other interested parties. Would like to see more diversity in their N.I.s too. That would be appreciated.
It could be a fun/great resource for students and other interested parties. Would like to see more diversity in their N.I.s too. That would be appreciated.
Also, maybe like Latin dancers, I'd like to see the academic equivalent of a Pro/Am debate. A N.I. and a student of a particular area is an interesting dynamic; love to see it in a classroom and am motivated by that type of dynamic myself.
I love to argue with professors because you can unearth way more information faster. When two experts argue with each other, you're often missing out on the foundational knowledge they both are well past explaining.
/end thread this concept is neat
/end thread this concept is neat
