This is a neat concept of a website encouraging more nuanced reasoned debate between two people: https://www.pairagraph.com/dialogue/354c72095d2f42dab92bf42726d785ff/1">https://www.pairagraph.com/dialogue/...

I& #39;m not sure about the way it& #39;s been executed. It& #39;s a bit more difficult to navigate than I think it needs to be. Or perhaps the format with a hard break lends itself to implying your argument must end and be reasoned? Unsure.

Would be interested how @pairagraph could expand this to include sources, as they& #39;re targeting "notable individuals."

It could be a fun/great resource for students and other interested parties. Would like to see more diversity in their N.I.s too. That would be appreciated.

Also, maybe like Latin dancers, I& #39;d like to see the academic equivalent of a Pro/Am debate. A N.I. and a student of a particular area is an interesting dynamic; love to see it in a classroom and am motivated by that type of dynamic myself.

I love to argue with professors because you can unearth way more information faster. When two experts argue with each other, you& #39;re often missing out on the foundational knowledge they both are well past explaining.

/end thread this concept is neat