Thread by @page_eco, Current polls highly favour Biden to win the US election.But do these [...]

Current polls highly favour Biden to win the US election.
But do these polls *influence* the result of the election itself by influencing the voting decision of people?

The evidence says *yes* and that it most likely favours Biden (thread)

You could imagine two possible effects of polls:
⁃Bandwagon effect: polls motivate the camp in front, demotivate the camp behind
⁃Underdog effect: polls motivate the camp behind (back to the wall), demotivate the camp in front (resting on laurels)

A very interesting paper finds that when a party is just behind, the underdog effect may exist. For that reason, parties may downplay their chances and present themselves as challengers.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2528690

But the evidence tends to suggest that when the expected result is not close, a bandwagon effect prevails: polls indicating that a candidate is ahead increase the candidate’s chances of winning the election.

For instance, we found that there is a bandwagon effect (the supporters of the losing party are less likely to vote) in French overseas territories who vote *after* the exit polls from the mainland have been released.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014292115000483

In the UK, general elections were staggered over two weeks before 1918. Research found a bandwagon effect in favour of the winning side which peaked around the 8th day of voting.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11127-012-0027-9.pdf

In the US, the possibility of such effect of early information has been discussed as the “West Coast effect”: the fact that early results from the East Coast can influence voters on the West Coast. http://www.digitalroots.io/blog/west-coast-effect/

The West Coast Effect

The West Coast Effect is the term given to an election controversy that da...

http://www.digitalroots.io/blog/west-coast-effect/

Effect of early results are extreme, but they suggest good polls can motivate and bad polls can demotivate voters, creating a bandwagon effect.
As a consequence, partisan organisations select good polls to push a winning narrative to their base.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19331681.2015.1063366?casa_token=c-WuZPXqBv8AAAAA%3AGmVEVIG2V5jVnYwOCZ-VZjisKv5L3sQG-uq7XE4RgxsE1RuzPmu1Gsp2P1iOpVkDFq2FaiEnAjv9mQ

Effect of early results are extreme, but they suggest good polls can motivate and bad polls can demotivate voters, creating a bandwagon effect. As a consequence, partisan organisations select good polls to push a winning narrative to their base. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19331681.2015.1063366?casa_token=c-WuZPXqBv8AAAAA%3AGmVEVIG2V5jVnYwOCZ-VZjisKv5L3sQG-uq7XE4RgxsE1RuzPmu1Gsp2P1iOpVkDFq2FaiEnAjv9mQ

Polling organisations are themselves typically not partisan in democracies. They care about their reputation and parties can’t easily influence them. Polling errors tend to be due to their methodology and sample. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/which-pollsters-to-trust-in-2018/

Which Pollsters To Trust In 2018

As FiveThirtyEight has evolved over the past 10 years, we’ve taken an increasingly “macro” view of polling. By that, I mean: We’re more interested in how the po…

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/which-pollsters-to-trust-in-2018/

But something can be influenced: betting markets. They are used to estimate the candidates’ winning chances.
In 2020, Trump’s chances have been surprisingly high in betting markets given the polls.
ht @arpitrage

Research has shown that, in theory, such markets can be influenced by manipulators trying to move prices in one direction.
https://academic.oup.com/jeea/article-abstract/5/2-3/554/2295776

And experiments have shown that manipulators can indeed push the market prices in the direction they wish. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268112002223?casa_token=ba2PS0w1kToAAAAA:Q6bWRTHp77HQvZsNX5gGliYgoMY0sqP-7jxk9PqP_wLYrNRUtTt8KUMdsNKBbp2zzhG0-XSUHj0

Affecting policy by manipulating prediction markets: Experimental evidence

Documented results indicate prediction markets effectively aggregate information and form accurate predictions. This has led to a proliferation of mar…

https://academic.oup.com/jeea/article-abstract/5/2-3/554/2295776

There is an incentive to manipulate betting markets’ prices, to influence the election.
Likely as a result, we have found that political markets are quite biased: Trump’s winning probability of “40%” may actually mean only 20% without a bias.
https://academic.oup.com/ej/article-abstract/123/568/491/5079498

The best predictions are certainly given by @FiveThirtyEight and @TheEconomist, rather than by betting markets. (End)
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/
https://projects.economist.com/us-2020-forecast/president

cc @LeightonVW @paulmotty @MSmithsonPB @JustinWolfers @jben0

You can follow @page_eco.

Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: