The issue isn& #39;t "leaked info", which I myself have happily published before (please leak to me!). The issue is that the Post have not described any process by which they satisfactorily authenticated the information. Either they simply didn& #39;t do that or they are withholding. https://twitter.com/BlakeG228/status/1317832741069651968">https://twitter.com/BlakeG228...

Needless to say that if they had described a plausible custody chain and a process of authentication for that information they wouldn& #39;t have copped a ban. (I don& #39;t agree with the ban, I think that social media companies should have just applied a click-through flag)

The Post is not acting like a newspaper in this matter, they are acting like collaborators in election shit-sheeting

Oh and by the way, in the absence of a plausible custody chain, and even if the documents turn out to be authentic, no one asked & #39;what is the story here& #39; beyond the one RG wanted them to tell. TDB got the *real* story yesterday https://www.thedailybeast.com/rudy-giuliani-says-theres-only-5050-chance-i-worked-with-a-russian-spy-to-dig-dirt-on-bidens">https://www.thedailybeast.com/rudy-giul...