Read on Twitter
I keep thinking about how Amy Coney Barrett had zero notes with her during her testimony. Supporters of hers cheered her for that.
But as @JoanBiskupic wrote, it's all just a strategy. Now she doesn't have to answer questions or be transparent. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/13/politics/barrett-dodge-senate-hearing/index.html
But as @JoanBiskupic wrote, it's all just a strategy. Now she doesn't have to answer questions or be transparent. https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/13/politics/barrett-dodge-senate-hearing/index.html
She never disclosed her association with People of Praise. Supporters could say that was because she knew she could be mocked for her faith.
But that doesn't excuse not listing it. And also scrubbing yourself and your family from the site.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/09/27/politics/amy-coney-barrett-people-of-praise/index.html&ved=2ahUKEwjSobjO17bsAhW6mnIEHdKkAVsQFjAAegQIChAC&usg=AOvVaw3USNjbWCn6q_Cmyq-TAO8d&cf=1
But that doesn't excuse not listing it. And also scrubbing yourself and your family from the site.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/09/27/politics/amy-coney-barrett-people-of-praise/index.html&ved=2ahUKEwjSobjO17bsAhW6mnIEHdKkAVsQFjAAegQIChAC&usg=AOvVaw3USNjbWCn6q_Cmyq-TAO8d&cf=1
Then there is Barrett's incomplete paperwork. Now, the last 6 successful SCOTUS nominees also had to submit updated paperwork. It is common and these questionnaires are lengthy and thorough. She did submit thousands of pages of paperwork. BUT...
