Read on Twitter
#AmyConeyBarrett: “Climate change is a very contentious matter of public debate.”
Science: Actually, climate change is just scientific fact. That greenhouse gases lead to warming has been well understood by even fossil fuel corporations since the 1970s.
Science: Actually, climate change is just scientific fact. That greenhouse gases lead to warming has been well understood by even fossil fuel corporations since the 1970s.
Also, THIS. (And “wonky but important” is my all time favorite category of things.) https://twitter.com/evanlweber/status/1316527131447324672">https://twitter.com/evanlwebe...
. @EvergreenAction put it so well. https://twitter.com/evergreenaction/status/1316185793438703617">https://twitter.com/evergreen...
If #AmyConeyBarrett is unable to understand and acknowledge basic scientific facts — like that climate change is happening — then she is clearly unqualified to to make decisions based on evidence, and therefore unqualified to be a judge at any level of government.
Of note: In 1856, Eunice Newton Foote discovered that carbon dioxide would lead to global warming. EIGHTEEN FIFTY SIX. This is very old news, Barrett. #WomenInSTEM
Also, what @klugesan said. https://twitter.com/klugesan/status/1316584599963697153">https://twitter.com/klugesan/...
And what @MaryHeglar said. https://twitter.com/maryheglar/status/1316575139803418625">https://twitter.com/maryhegla...
p.s. I do wish @kamalaharris hadn’t framed her question as whether Barrett “believed” in climate change — it’s not Santa Claus or the tooth fairy! 
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🧚🏽♀️" title="Fee (mittlerer Hautton)" aria-label="Emoji: Fee (mittlerer Hautton)">https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🎅🏽" title="Santa Claus (mittlerer Hautton)" aria-label="Emoji: Santa Claus (mittlerer Hautton)">
