Read on Twitter
“Freedom of speech” means that you get to decide what happens on your platform whether or not the Trump campaign likes it.
I think all bookstores should stock ONE BILLION AMERICANS because it’s awesome. But free speech means they are free to choose. https://twitter.com/marc_lotter/status/1316467966045810693">https://twitter.com/marc_lott...
I think all bookstores should stock ONE BILLION AMERICANS because it’s awesome. But free speech means they are free to choose. https://twitter.com/marc_lotter/status/1316467966045810693">https://twitter.com/marc_lott...
Some publications (the good ones) reviewed ONE BILLION AMERICANS.
But The Washington Post deciding not to isn’t abridging my free speech, it’s them exercising their free speech.
The fact that I have strong feelings about the decision doesn’t change that.
But The Washington Post deciding not to isn’t abridging my free speech, it’s them exercising their free speech.
The fact that I have strong feelings about the decision doesn’t change that.
Now you could say “okay, it’s a natural monopoly, it needs to be regulated as such.”
That’s how we treat network TV and especially how we treated it in the pre-cable era. But in practice that meant *more constrained speech* so as to avoid bothering people.
That’s how we treat network TV and especially how we treated it in the pre-cable era. But in practice that meant *more constrained speech* so as to avoid bothering people.
At any rate as a veteran of the “Obama wants to bring back the Fairness Doctrine” wars of 2009, I feel like it’s raining on my wedding day hearing this stuff from conservatives.
