My position on this will make no one happy:

Twitter can run it's platform however it wants and conservatives need to think *really* hard about whether they want a rule that *requires* platforms to host information in the name of "political neutrality" but... https://twitter.com/bdomenech/status/1316475451242696704

...this is the Google/Federalist ad decision all over again; a generally applicable rule being applied against a conservative source/article at the worst possible political moment.

It looks bad and is going to go right into the bad faith talking points against 230. Already has.

And finally, why have a rule against the distribution of hacked material anyway? Hacked material can have legitimate news value.

The NY Post story is probably trash anyway. Let people share it if they want.