Non-enforcement should expand to include all conservative rulings by the Supreme Court. Any liberal victories remain binding, because they cut against the Court& #39;s illegitimate conservative biases (due to appointments by 2 illegitimate presidents & Senate). https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2020/10/14/coalition-prosecutors-attorneys-general-across-us-vow-not-enforce-antiabortion-laws/">https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law...

In case it isn& #39;t clear, the #1 priority here is entirely remaking the courts w/ a popularly elected President & Congress. The distinction above is a half-measure until then, but if the distinction bothers you (or is unclear), just focus on remaking all of federal government.

An analogy may help on the 1st part: if your uncle cheats at chess & "wins," you don& #39;t accept the result. If your uncle cheats & you win anyway, it& #39;s a more resoundingly legitimate result. We don& #39;t have equal say in choosing gov& #39;t. It doesn& #39;t represent us. That cheats democracy.