The & #39;smoking gun& #39; email in the NY Post story — even if it is authentic, given the massive red flags — doesn& #39;t actually say what the story says it does.

Also, recall: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/13/us/politics/russian-hackers-burisma-ukraine.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/1...

Again, stipulating that the suspect email is real, there& #39;s literally nothing in it that says Joe Biden met with a Burisma adviser.

"The opportunity to meet," may just as easily have meant Hunter promised a meeting in the future that may never have occurred.

Lastly, if such a meeting occurred, it should be pretty easy to pinpoint with accuracy when and where, which would seem an important part of reporting a story like this before blasting out the innuendo — especially given the suspect actors involved.

Important addendum: Nothing about the premise of the story adds up. Every credible source has testified that the prosecutor involved was fired because he was *not* investigating corruption and removing him made it likelier Burisma would face a real probe. https://twitter.com/danielsgoldman/status/1316357178018738177">https://twitter.com/danielsgo...