Some of the best critiques of CRT are from the liberal academics in the 80s & 90s who were confronting the first rounds of critical scholarship. Exhibit A: Douglas Litowitz (reviewing Delgado, et al. CRT: The Cutting Edge):

Although he falls into a central CRT critique (ie denial of public/private distinction) this is still good:

Here he predicts the balkanization/disciplinary contradictions of CRT due to the priority of lives exp/crit consciousness:

Throughout, his critique rightly focuses on the narcissism and methodological incoherence of the discipline (even though he expresses much sympathy with the insights of the theorists)

... the abandonment of doctrinal solutions for storytelling/emotional appeals

Perfect, terse explanation of Bell’s interest convergence theory: