What do you think? "Should US foreign policy focus on Great-Power competition?"

You can click agree or disagree below.

2/
. @stephenwertheim, Deputy Director of Research & Policy at @QuincyInst, answered by highlighting how a great-power approach to foreign policy could be harmful to domestic health and security.

3/
. @tparsi, Co-Founder and Executive Vice President of @QuincyInst, argued that a great power framework could be counterproductive to solving urgent global threats, like climate change, which do not have military solutions.

4/
President of @QuincyInst, Andrew Bacevich, stated that U.S. foreign policy should be primarily focused on enhancing "the well-being of the American people". A focus on great-power competition would be secondary, if at all necessary.

5/
. @QuincyInst's @segoddard supports great-power competition as an organizing principle, but says it's misinterpreted. Because the U.S. possesses unrivaled military power, foreign policy should emphasize competition through economic, technological, and diplomatic means.

6/
John Mearsheimer, a @QuincyInst Fellow, agreed with the prompt, citing the inextricable link between great power competition and "the survival of the state".

"If a state does not survive it cannot pursue any of its other goals," Mearsheimer points out.

7/
. @QuincyInst Fellows @samuelmoyn, @stephenWalt, and @Alden_Young expressed disagreement with @ForeignAffairs's prompt. @Alden_Young suggested focusing U.S. foreign policy through a cooperative lens, rather than a competitive one.

8/
We would love to hear your answer to @ForeignAffairs's intriguing question. Lend your voice by scrolling to the beginning of this thread and answering our poll.

Visit our website to stay at the cutting edge of foreign policy: https://quincyinst.org/ 

9/9
You can follow @QuincyInst.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: