I feel like the difference between myself and some of these people who balk at the idea of Entrapdak is... when Hordak behaves in a poor manner (say snapping at Entrapta after his armor sparks in front of Adora), they'll take it as "he's abusive, they can't be together!:"

Whereas for me it's more... he acted poorly. Did he do so with the intent to hurt or control her? Did he do so despite being easily able to choose a different course of action? And, most importantly: do his actions mark him as *actually dangerous* to her?

Essentially: do said actions mark a need for growth and development without actually making him too dangerous to form a relationship with?

For me, the answer is obviously yes.