As I keep trying to tell you: Critical Theories don't take over at the level of leadership, they take over at the level of administrative bureaucracies. This is true in our schools, and it will be true in our government. Biden's and Harris's views are irrelevant except on this. https://twitter.com/DeAngelisCorey/status/1314618772192362497
I don't really have the slightest idea what Kamala Harris's politics are beyond being obviously and wholly unpopular. Biden possibly being an old-guard Democrat is irrelevant. Will they pack the court? Will they greenlight more administrative bureaucracy? Those are what matter.
Critical Social Justice Theory is subversive and passive-aggressive. It's also administrative, put into application by busybodies who like to go to meetings and control other people with their little signs and policies. The head is either permissive to this or resistant to it.
Woke ideology will not try to just take over the US government, laws, and constitution in a direct coup. It will, instead, work its way in and use administrative policy and clever redefinitions, concepts, and manipulations to subvert the meanings of things until they have control
One of the easiest lightbulb moments about this subversion is the attempt to subvert the Fourth Amendment's protections against illegal search and seizure (useful for neo-communists to undo). If we all live on stolen land and used it to make stolen wealth, it's not protected.
The Fourth Amendment can stay completely intact exactly as it is written, and yet it won't apply to anything beyond what the administrative caste decides it applies to, which will all be determined by the usual power-dynamics double standards.
Fifth Amendment protections against being a witness against oneself and for due process of law can be subverted and hollowed in similarly. If hate crimes are made a crime, and hate is systemic, then the presumption is of guilt, not innocence. Silence is complicity and violence.
Under a Woke reinterpretation, if fully implemented, to plead the Fifth will be to confess if one is on the wrong side of the power-dynamics double standard and a guaranteed right otherwise. Denial is one of the first symptoms of white supremacy, they say.
First Amendment protections of speech will be of little use because they will move the location of accountability away from the government and to the mobs that are their actual enforcers. The government can refrain from infringing upon speech if one cannot safely speak.
It's extremely important to understand that this is the Woke approach. They will create administrative policies, like DAs taking systemic power into account for charging people, that enable mobs that disable the First Amendment in practice, etc., without changing them.
The Fourth Amendment can be subverted to Woke purposes by redefining "property" in terms of when it is legitimately (on their count) held and illegitimately held. The analysis will be 100% through their only lens: their ideas of systemic power, injustice, and justice.
Contracts and policies across the board can be modified to mean something different without changing a single word if the meanings of the words within them get changed. This is why 2+2=4 matters. It can only EVER equal something other than 4 when a meaning has changed.
You can follow @ConceptualJames.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: