The point of the dissent, on gun rights, that Durbin is talking about with ACB is that she thinks felons should get guns, BUT NOT VOTING RIGHTS. That's actually the turn Durbin should make here.

Dude, @DickDurbin LOOK AT YOUR PHONE MAN.

ASK HER ABOUT VOTING RIGHTS NOW! ASK HER WHY FELONS SHOULD GET GUNS BUT NOT VOTES!

THIS CASE ISN'T ABOUT GUNS!!! AARRGGHHH. It's about her view on "virtue based restrictions." She thinks, SHE'S WRITTEN, that "virtue based restrictions," like convictions, are not allowed to take away guns, but MAY BE allowed to take away other rights, LIKE VOTING

HERE we go. Thank GOD

Amy Coney Barrett is lying. She said that "virtue based restrictions" may be okay to take away voting rights. She said they're not okay to take away gun rights.

Lol, she says she expressed "no view" on whether the law should "change" in regards to felon voting rights. Which means that she thinks that the law as it is now is that felons CAN'T vote, notwithstanding the fundamental right to vote.

Thanks for getting to the point @DickDurbin. It's a point that people should think about since Amy Coney Barrett is being sent her to HAND THE ELECTION TO TRUMP. https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/barrett-senate-hearing/