FOUR: Some have argued that non-Title I schools need to raise a lot via PTAs to account for the extra $ poor schools get that they don't ...

That argument flatly contradicts the intent of Title I. (That's a thread for another day.)
FIVE: No one I've interviewed has argued that PTAs shouldn't exist. They've argued in favor of more transparency.

Other ideas floated:
-pairing strong/weak PTAs from different schools
-giving baseline funding to all PTAs
LASTLY: As stated in my story, PTAs are far from the only groups that raise money to benefit schools. Many alumni and booster groups are involved in this, too.

More on that to come, hopefully sooner rather than later, via @courierjournal.
UPDATE:
You can follow @mandy_mclaren.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: