1) Important (long) piece. I'll summarize what I can. From "Unconstrained Analytics: "'The Left’s Strategy and Tactics To Transform America" by
Stephen Coughlin and Richard Higgins (July 2019)

2) See if this doesn't describe the neverTrumper/McTurd/George Lincoln Rockwell types

*"The political rhetoric driving American politics runs along well-trodden paths sustaining a political framework from a by-gone era incapable of coming to terms with the political movements threatening our constitutional system today.

*Constrained by this archaic rhetoric. . .

contd . . . mainstream & conservative players are outmaneuvered in an information battle-space they hardly perceive; responding to current threats in under-inclusive manners.

*The "otherism" strategy developed by Marxists to destroy America focuses on the systematic . . .

contd . . . destruction of identity leading to the systematic disenfranchisement of Americans from America.

*“Political correctness is the enforcement mechanism of the multicultural narrative that implements Neo-Marxist objectives.”

*Narratives that conservative leaders neither control nor understand drive national policy. When Republican leaders shrink from Constitutional principles for fear of being accused of racism, sexism, homophobia, etc., they are subordinating those principles to neo-Marxist . . .

*contd . . . narratives designed for that purpose.

*By submitting to these narratives, establishment Republicans first
become pliant, and then obedient to the Left, accommodating it through “words that work” that create the illusion of opposition . . .

*contd . . . while actually signaling surrender in the information battle space.

[BINGO! Precisely the "polite" Minion/McTurd crowd]

*What Republicans demoralize, the Left then disenfranchises. In this role, establishment Republicans become the defeat mechanism4 of the Left.

*Political Warfare is a Maoist Insurgency concept that recognizes the role narratives play in overwhelming rule of law societies.

While an individual may not be politically active, that person-through the supporting consumption of mass market media-will become . . .

*contd . . . more susceptible to activist messaging and discontent." (i.e., the NFL, NBA, Hollywood).

*What is popularly called “fake news” and the “deep-state” are better understood as propaganda and the counter-state.

[Here's where it gets good:]

3) Trump succeeded because his rhetoric intuitively rubs up against the very attack narratives the Left uses to co-opt establishment Republicans. The unanticipated success of his brute force attacks positions him as an EXISTENTIAL THREAT that forces the Left. . .

3) contd . . . into an openly aggressive posture prematurely."

[Take a break: so what did I tell you about "Access Hollywood" in 2016 and the riots this time around?

They were LAUNCHED TOO EARLY. Why? See above. Trump provokes them into attacking too soon.

4) "The political warfare strategy of the Left is dependent upon the successful execution and exploitation of narratives that Republicans conform to that TRUMP, WHEN ON MISSION, INTUITIVELY ATTACKS."

[BINGO BINGO BINGO}

5) Ok, so remember the church? Trump doesn't even speak.

5) contd . . . He just walked across the street with a BIBLE in his hand and said, without saying anything, "We will NOT give up this ground. We WILL support the Word of God."

6) With political rhetoric escalating to open threats of violence, it is imperative that the Left be properly analyzed & scoped. Threats of
violence are no longer limited to street thugs like Antifa, but now come from leading Democratic voices, upscale progressive establishments

6) contd . . . "& even Congressional Democratic leadership."

7) "As the “moderates” use of violent rhetoric already signals, this will accelerate the Democratic leadership’s movement to the openly Neo-Marxist Left. Serving as a controlled opposition, this will likewise . . .

7) contd . . . accelerate the Republican leadership’s drift to the Neo-Marxist Left as well. How is that? Same old-same old, except now it will increasingly expose the Republican establishment’s increasingly desperate efforts to meet their “moderate” Democratic peers . . .

7) contd . . . "in a middle that does not exist, thus further isolating themselves from their own base."

THANK YOU JESUS and BOOMSHAKALAKA!

8) You can plug in the names/faces here: Minion, McTurd, Tom Collins, Sasshole--the "reach across the aisle" folks.

9) They argue that the struggles inside the DemoKKKrat party are NOT a struggle between moderates & radicals but an internal leadership struggle for control . . .

9) contd . . of the movement's non-violent main actors (the "public face" like Botoxic, Spewmore, Comrade De Blasio) & the violent actors.

10) In 1999 the Chicoms wrote a paper in which they said that America's inability to recognize political warfare threats is so degraded . .

10) contd . . it may have lost the capability to do so."

11) "To counter the Left, it is important to anticipate its movements."

PRECISELY. This is why I urge so many of you to ditch Faux News--it is a watered down version of CNN, but is NOT fighting back.

12) This is why I, "America's History Teacher," urge you to instead focus on what LIBERALS ARE SAYING & DOING, then read it 180 degrees opposite.

13) They always lie. Always. Therefore, what are they lying about now?

14) The authors go on to say: "One need only sit in a counter-terror or related national security briefing, or listen to associated Congressional testimony, or read Islamic Movement texts written for non-Muslims while playing Buzzword Bingo with terms & phrases like . . .

14) contd . . . “the world is so complex (all we can do is manage chaos)” and “it’s complicated” with others to get a sense for how deeply nstitutionalized this logic bomb has embedded."

15) So, think of John Bolton or H. R. McMaster. I don't think either of them are . . .

15) contd . . . bad guys, but I think they were both steeped in this "complicated world" stuff that they had no way to deal with a straightforward Trump.

(Think Ronald Reagan: "What's your view on the Cold War?" "Simple: We win, they lose.")

16) When Reagan said that, people had GIVEN UP trying to win because 30 years earlier everything was (rightly) based on MAD. But things change.

17) After 30-40 pages dealing with Hegel, Marx, Marcuse, and others, the narrative gets back to the practical.

18) "This assessment is not so much calling for a reassessment of the Left as it is pointing out that there currently exists no articulable frame from which to truly engage the Left."

19) Authors point out that the "war on women," securing the border, "white privilege" . . .

19) contd . . . are usually combated by conservatives as disassociated topics.

NO!

20) "America is not just a people or a place, it is an entire cosmological order; a vision of the world informed by the belief that we are all afforded inalienable rights endowed by the Creator"

21) Trump's victory "met all the requirements of the Hegelian leadership paradigm for a shift in the order."

Trump was a fundamental BREAK in the previous 30 years at least of this spoogified drift.

22) I'm taking a lot of time with this because this is the first, serious, deep intellectual understanding of the threat Trump poses to both parties.

23) "Trump constitutes an unacceptable shift in the zeitgeist that must be snuffed out before it culminates."

24) "In Trump, the universal merged with
the particular in the individual; a real manifestation of the Napoleonic “man of
action”.

The WLs immediately recognized that Trump was them in reverse!!

Estalishment Rs are a "pet opposition whose role is to reposition the issues . .

24) contd . . ."[within the] enforcement narratives."

BINGO again. In other words, RINOs/Swamp Rs are there to tell you why we can never overturn Roe v. Wade, or why we cannot conceive of eliminating the Fed (& I might have an argument against that--but let's have the debate.)

25) Political Correctness is the enforcement narrative, the enforcement mechanism for messaging that "assures that all political debate will be on terms favorable to the left."

BBBBIIIIIIINNNNNGOOOOO!

26) Without mentioning Marx, this piece gets to why it's so hard to debate Marxism--because Marx moves the whole narrative/discussion mechanism to his own goofball anal-ridden rhetoric. You're lost the minute you say "class" or "worker."

27) "From beginning to end, the entire process is rigged. Conformance & compliance remain the indicators of information supremacy that renders
establishment leaders so strategically unaware that they are 'satisfied with a fictitious reality.'"

28) Narratives are used to . . .

28) contd . . . enforce speech codes. "The fact of being born an American, living in America, you cannot say you are American because that is racism.

You cannot defend the Constitution on college campuses because that is white privilege."

29) Whew! Long. Dense, I get it. Their upshot is that it takes great effort to realize what the Left is doing. All of it must be understood in Maoist terms. (check)

But when you say that to a Minion Romney, his eyes glaze over. He cannot imagine we are in a war with the Left.

30) Same with the Broken Kristol/Goldburger/Bootless/Yoda Wilsons of the world. They are TOTALLY contained in the Maoist cultural narrative---managing the change.

31) To them Trump is a fundamental threat to everything because he rejects the foundation of anti-Americanism.

32) Just to hear him on Rush's show talk about not just America today, but our phenomenal potential . . . these bilgepuppies cannot even conceive . . . I know, brace yourself . . . that their "good friends across the aisle" like Botoxic & Spewmore are the vanguard of Maoism.

33) This is why we have to win on Nov. 3. If we do, that will not be Yorktown. That "might" be Trenton.

34) There is a long ideological war looming. Very long. No, we won't be able to "go back to normal" for a very long time, maybe not in our lifetimes.

35) Because the 50 Long March these people have been on is in full bloom.

Then again, the Gipper didn't think the USSR would fall quite as quickly or easily as it did.