The argument about screenshotting NFTs is pathetic. Do they not realize all valuable art is available in print form? This doesn't replace the value of a verified artwork that has actual resale value. How many "Mona Lisa" prints exist? How many similarly created artworks?

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/perhaps-even-a-leonardo-copy-shows-you-re-rich-and-cultured

I've no idea about the platforms or tokens, this thread isn't for that discussion. But I think the general arguments against digital art nfts are very weak. I don't see the difference between paper and bytes and if anything digital nfts have greater verifiability.

Enhanced speculative purposes/liquidity will provide some short-term value but this is probably a trend that will take a decade to come around. One could also argue arts primary use is money laundering/tax manipulation so on that front NFTs will take a while to really replace.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Ugliness is in the eye of the bagholder.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keynesian_beauty_contest