Totally agreed. The problem is: the neo structuralists behind the house report are not interested in a conversation. https://twitter.com/dougmelamed/status/1314276845668298753

They consider evidence based policy to be a construct designed to serve the interests of a wealthy elite of intellectuals and businesses 2/n

Sad to see the house fall for this nonsense 3/n

It is practicality, not class ideology, that led US courts, and now increasingly EU courts, to adopt the rules and standards that govern consumer welfare spirited antitrust 4/n

In a changing economy, a discussion on their revision is legit. But a complete overhaul that takes no account of the requirements of judicial practice is a recipe for failed expectations and further political discontentment /END