Read on Twitter
It's that whole extreme-ism lust again really. There's valid arguments on boths sides, neither want to admit the faults their preferred ism allows. I can see reasonings for both tbh.. For example, many people are meek, less knowledgeable or less capable either from illness ..
or willful stagnation. The reality is today there are many of these types. These can't operate without guidance and help. The require leaders and caretakers. They require a savior to help them survive. Given those requirements are primarily filled or developed by humans..
it's easy to understand how those programs, services, offerenings and leadership quickly become compromised. It's only baked in to our being after all. This leads us back to sq1 no matter the tweaks either..
From the other perspective, the ability to define and create ..
From the other perspective, the ability to define and create ..
reality that surrounds and ultimately a living that suits you as a being is the ultimate human achievement. The ability to provide materials, services, programs, devices and more to fill a need for others that not only helps others but yourself is sort of the ideal situation ...
problem is it still allows for that consolidation of corrupt power and we're back to sq1. Some call it corporatism, a fork of capitalism.. but all the isms have an excuse why their version of the compromised ism isn't the real ism.
Being that there's an 'ism' in the first ...
Being that there's an 'ism' in the first ...
in the first place provides a wide enough scapegoat that we can avoid the faults, maintain our defenses and laser guided protection devices but it'll never result anything better than what we've already seen. It's that whole ..
Trying the same thing things over and over again expecting different results thing that seems to get in our way here.
Anyhow, this thread thrown to the ether was sponsored by the video below, h/t obi
Anyhow, this thread thrown to the ether was sponsored by the video below, h/t obi
