One intriguing aspect of the #COVID19 pandemic is the extent to which it has exposed current ideologies such as the current left-right divide for their hollow tribalism, rather than carriers of shared moral values.
1/

The dissonance and internal inconstencies on all sides of the political spectrum within our societies may have become too strong for current tribalisms to survive much beyond the pandemic.
2/

It feels interesting to speculate along what axis our societies may become polarised in the future. I would predict the major new divide in society will crystallise along the 'existentialist vs. essentialist' axis that currently divides society on how to respond to #COVID19.
3/

Existentialism, in short, both in its atheistic and religious expressions, recognises an individual person as a free and responsible agent determining their own development through acts of the will, which gives meaning to life.
4/

Essentialism in its political form can be defined as: "The doctrine that states that there is a single nature and destiny for human kind and that an elite is indispensable for bringing this about through political action." Hugh P. McDonald
5/ https://books.google.ch/books/about/Political_Philosophy_and_Ideology.html?id=dSCCAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

It may be of interesting to note in the context of #COVID19 that while existentialism tends to represent the moral values generally associated to 'modern Western culture', essentialism is more in line with those traditionally associated to 'Far Eastern philosophy'.
6/