First of all, I really appreciate that @gitlab replied. Earlier, in a similar tweet (see https://twitter.com/neuroprinciples/status/1292220027303874560?s=20)">https://twitter.com/neuroprin... I mention
@coursera @github @MITxonedX @SfNtweets to suggest the same thing, but they even didn’t bother to reply! 1/n https://twitter.com/gitlab/status/1312732222408003585">https://twitter.com/gitlab/st...

. @gitlab, I’m aware of the general issue behind your obligation. My point was, @neuromatch has had experienced a similar legal obligation, and they manage to find a legal solution for it. 2/n

If you’d like to provide an inclusive service, it is worth getting in touch with @neuromatch. Maybe you also find a way to provide your service to people in all countries (in particular for students and scientists who truly need it). 3/n

It might not work at the end, but at least, you tried and it shows you truly care about openness and inclusivity. 4/4

So, @gitlab in case at the end you decided to give it a try, @GunnarBlohm @seanescola @bradpwyble expressed their willingness to share the experience they had with @neuromatch and the embargo (see this thread: https://twitter.com/neuroprinciples/status/1292220028956401664?s=20)">https://twitter.com/neuroprin...