" #Arctic Expedition’s Dress Code Raises Concerns About #Sexism in #Science." Great to see this covered in @nytimes.

But the author& #39;s claim that “there is not much research” on “inequities faced by women in science-related fields”? That’s absurd. 1/ https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1312442309154234369">https://twitter.com/nytimes/s...
There are entire journal issues dedicated to the subject, like this one from @TheLancet 3/ https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/issue/vol393no10171/PIIS0140-6736(19)X0006-9">https://www.thelancet.com/journals/...
There are also massive reading lists with research about diversity, equity, & inclusion in science, including gender research, like this one by Priya Shukla 4/ https://medium.com/@priyology/diversity-inclusion-in-science-a-reading-list-a45cea40b972">https://medium.com/@priyolog...
And check out the DEI Resource Repository from @Polar_Research, which includes peer-reviewed research on gender inequity in science (you can search the repository for “gender”)… 8/ https://www.apecs.is/career-resources/diversity-equity-inclusion/dei-resources.html">https://www.apecs.is/career-re...
Yes, there’s much more research to be done. But the NYT& #39;s claim that “there is not much research” on “inequities faced by women in science-related fields”? No way. The research is abundant and clear: it’s time to accelerate change. /
You can follow @morganseag.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: