You may know this:
UK #InternalMarket Bill has arrived @UKHouseofLords.
But prob. no debate til after crunch EU Council, i.e. week after next.

But what you may not know:
It looks quite different to way it did before, inc. *big* amendments to part on N.Ireland #Protocol...
🧐
1/8
Eagle-eyed viewers among you will have spotted the first change.
The clauses have different numbers #⃣
Part 5 now starts with 42, not 40.

So the contentious clauses (which, "yes, do break international law") are now:
44 [export declns],
45 [state aid]
& 47 [law? schmaw!].

2/8
The amendments made in @HouseofCommons (covered here) were proposed by the UK Govt.

Clause 42 (GB to NI) no change.

Clause 43: changes to allow new checks to occur NI to GB for certain purposes.

These amendments allow such checks for
* VAT & Excise
* GB biosecurity

3/8
On VAT & Excise, it's making sure a [new kind of] 'check, control or administrative process' can be used for these purposes, e.g. preventing double taxation, collecting duties.

#Protocol sees EU rules on VAT on goods apply in NI but revenue goes to HMRC

Anyway, moving on...
4/8
On Biosecurity:

Pests and diseases aren't great respecters of #borders, even watery and unfettered ones.

This amendment allows new checks, controls etc. on NI to GB movement of goods in order to deal with a threat to biosecurity in GB, inc (hypothetically) from NI.

🪳🦟🦠

5/8
But that isn't even the exciting part!

We come now to clause 47.

The
"Notwithstanding inconsistency or incompatibility with international or other domestic law"
One.

Just take a look at what's new here...
😲

6/8
The amended clause specifies that Section 6(1)* of #HumanRights Act 1998 does not apply in relation to Cl. 44 & 45 (the ones to breach the #Protocol).

That section requires acts of public authorities to be compatible with ECHR rights.

Why explicitly disapply it here?
❓❓
7/8
You can follow @hayward_katy.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: