These comments last night were probably thrilling for some. To me, they are beyond frustrating. Advertising for a movie on Twitter is not really the place to allege crimes -- while declaring yourself a potential accessory to them https://twitter.com/LueElizondo/status/1312939555838779393

Sadly, it follows a pattern. A site with a big "Invest Now" button is not a place to slyly *tease* a criminal conspiracy and dangerous intelligence failure https://dpo.tothestarsacademy.com/blog/progress-vs-congress-a-reminder-to-our-elected-officials-why-they-should-take-ufos-seriously-by-luis-elizondo

If there was a cover-up, it is a deadly serious matter. If Mr. Elizondo was "privy" to one, he should speak in a clear voice, and bring any and all documents he can. And not in the course of advertising for a film

It makes little sense to make a public accusation and simultaneously refuse to testify or provide evidence to *protect* the institutions committing the crime. Selectively hiding behind security oaths is unacceptable; do this via whistle-blower protections if needed

As it stands, if there is a conspiracy, Mr. Elizondo has made it easier for it to survive. He would arguably be one of the best witnesses and he has tainted his testimony by intermingling his own financial interests with the case.

I'll almost certainly hear from advocates of "Disclosure." I hope they understand that these comments are hardly helpful for their cause.

My commitment is to the rule of law and transparency, and sadly, it requires calling bullshit from officials when you see it.