Read on Twitter
About frequent rapid testing and the TRUMP White House:
I agree with ppl that the WH cluster f%^* is a shining example of how throwing caution to the wind in response to neg tests is a terrible idea
But it does NOT mean frequent rapid tests don’t help stop outbreaks
1/x
I agree with ppl that the WH cluster f%^* is a shining example of how throwing caution to the wind in response to neg tests is a terrible idea
But it does NOT mean frequent rapid tests don’t help stop outbreaks
1/x
No single protective layer is 
% for this virus. We need to remain vigilant.
We’ve said all along that frequent rapid tests help to stop spread similar to how masks help and should be considered similar to masks in how they are considered as a tool to curb outbreaks..
2/x
% for this virus. We need to remain vigilant. We’ve said all along that frequent rapid tests help to stop spread similar to how masks help and should be considered similar to masks in how they are considered as a tool to curb outbreaks..
2/x
A frequent rapid test can detect MANY people who are infectious, but not everyone - just a bad swab (potentially intentional) can cause a positive to look negative.
But the point is that if used frequently, they can catch ppl early in their infection...
3/x
But the point is that if used frequently, they can catch ppl early in their infection...
3/x
Because a test is never %, we still need to work to stop additional virus in the air that may infect others. A test cannot stop this. Masks and distancing can
The WH failed this step in an epic way. The advisors who determined the plan in the Rosegarden were simply wrong
4/x
%, we still need to work to stop additional virus in the air that may infect others. A test cannot stop this. Masks and distancing canThe WH failed this step in an epic way. The advisors who determined the plan in the Rosegarden were simply wrong
4/x
But even here, frequent tests are working to curb the outbreak!
It is for frequent testing that Trump and others were identified and isolated early from others so that they can no longer be a danger to others, including many vulnerable ppl, at least while in isolation.
5/x
It is for frequent testing that Trump and others were identified and isolated early from others so that they can no longer be a danger to others, including many vulnerable ppl, at least while in isolation.
5/x
Masks and distancing alone cannot identify someone who is transmitting virus and tests alone cannot stop someone from transmitting. Tests can help identify ppl and give them knowledge about their status so they don’t put others in harms way
But we need to maintain all three
6/x
But we need to maintain all three
6/x
The goal of massive rapid frequent testing is to identify not everyone transmitting but simply enough ppl to drop R below 1 and bring outbreaks to a crawl. That’s their real power.
7/x
7/x
If frequent testing is used inappropriately as passports to party, they can backfire in individual cases. But the population outcomes can still far outweigh the backfires. In this case, onward spread from the superspreading event is being halted bc of frequent testing.
8/x
8/x
We should see this not as a moment to say frequent testing doesn’t work, but as a teaching moment to allow the public - and WH - to understand that public health programs must work and be organized together to succeed.
Spread can still happen for any number of reasons...
9/x
Spread can still happen for any number of reasons...
9/x
To curb spread we want to identify as many transmitting people as we can and ask them to isolate so they don’t transmit and we want to ask everyone else to continue taking basic precautions. They synergize and work much much better together than in isolation.
10/10
10/10
