i’m tired of people questioning the validity of astrology when references are made to transits after they already happened. astrology isn’t “fortune telling” and while it is rlly accurate when it comes to predictions, it’s more about overarching themes +

than predicting specific events exactly how they will happen. i heard the best analogy of this while listening to the astrology podcast, basically saying that astrology casts a shadow of the wall, but u can’t see any of the details. ie. you can see the outline of a cat’s +

shadow, but u cannot see the color of its fur. predictive astrology can accurately tell u what themes are coming up & what is most likely going to happen, but the specific manifest of these events and the events leading up to it can be completely unique +

for example: rn mercury (communication) is in scorpio (secrets) opposite uranus (unexpected events), so we know that sudden, unpredictable news is gunna come out. BUT we don’t know what that news will be until after it happens

one manifestation of this transit so far is the release of melania trump’s secret (scorpio) recordings (mercury).

see what i mean?? the secrets coming out is the “cat’s shadow” and the tapes being released is the “color of the cats fur”

hindsight will always be 20/20. i do not specialize in predictive astrology so pls forgive me if this oversimplified things. i really just want to debunk the notion that astrology isn’t legitimate when u make connections between transits and events after they already manifested

in fact, reflecting on the connections between transits and events is a great way to deepen ur own practice and become more refined in your own predictions/understanding of astrology in general