If you want to get up to speed quickly on the constitutional debate, I would start with this article by the Amar brothers. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1959&context=fss_papers">https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewc...
I would then read the response by John Manning. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2854357">https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/pape...
Here is the report on this by a bipartisan commission a decade ago, under the veil of ignorance, so to speak. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/06_continuity_of_government.pdf">https://www.brookings.edu/wp-conten...
This book by Brian Kalt has a good chapter on the problem. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300123517/constitutional-cliffhangers">https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780...
Also worth including: Acting attorney general McGregor& #39;s 1947 letter to the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, concluding that 1947 Succession Statute is constitutional because members of Congress are “Officers” under the Succession Clause. https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6818250/GPO-CRECB-1947.pdf">https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents...
You can follow @jacklgoldsmith.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: