This new report from @nature_org is so wrong on SO many levels: logically, morally, economically, politically, ecologically, etc. So sad that @nature_org is willfully and deliberately speeding up the destruction of biodiversity
Short thread
@anthfletch https://www.nature.org/en-us/newsroom/financing-nature/">https://www.nature.org/en-us/new...
Short thread
@anthfletch https://www.nature.org/en-us/newsroom/financing-nature/">https://www.nature.org/en-us/new...
Report argues there is a & #39;financing gap& #39; for biodiversity that we must & #39;close& #39;. This is completely misleading: it is not about MORE finance within an unsustainable economy, but transforming the unsustainable economy.
But neoliberal ideology cannot see that, hence the following:
But neoliberal ideology cannot see that, hence the following:
"Philanthropy is a way to distribute profits. Investing is a way that private sector generates profit". Hence we need "tax breaks, derisking guarantees and regulatory requirements—that induce the private sector to invest".
Of course: only private profits can ensure public aims
Of course: only private profits can ensure public aims
Report basically makes a plea for doubling down on commodifying - literally - the whole world and enabling private profiteering as the main way to restore biodiversity. This is not just a fantasy, its a deliberate and dangerous ideological attack on biodiversity.
@CaroRackete
@CaroRackete
But, the chair of the @PaulsonInst, former Goldman Sachs banker Henry Paulson, a staunch neoliberal ideologue, ends his forward saying & #39;nature is priceless& #39;. Things cannot become more ironic and contradictory.
This wilful ideological misinformation and the status quo-powers behind them is precisely what #ConvivialConservation @convivconserv and many others ( @LongoFiore) are up against. Clearly, an uphill battle. https://convivialconservation.com/ ">https://convivialconservation.com/">...