I think its rough, but has promise (as with all these efforts). My overall goal (a dream) would be a reduction in the need for courts. I think many issues have been transformed into "legal disputes" that would best be solved w/o courts. As the court workload decreases ... https://twitter.com/RichardMoorhead/status/1311617745142898690

the the mix of matters before courts changes (fewer "simple" matters) the "need" for online courts declines. Instead, we keep building systems on systems (waste on waste) as so-called solutions.

Canada has taken (the lead?) in this area by discouraging the use of attorneys ...

in certain jurisdictions for certain matters. Again, still rough but directionally has merit.

The US has a plethora of "online courts" (e.g., eBay, Amazon) which work well for the vendor. But, the "litigants" already are online and in the system. Go outside those ...

captive worlds and the problems mount rapidly. US also presents a much more complex legal system given all the jurisdictions. Simply finding the right court can be a challenge. But, I digress.