Read on Twitter
THREAD
@john_john172 is exactly the person I& #39;m talking about.
HE doesn& #39;t perceive what @realDonaldTrump did last night, so he tells ME that MY perceptions are faulty.
But he PROVES in his attempt to correct my double-plus ungood thinking that HE& #39;S wrong.
@john_john172 is exactly the person I& #39;m talking about.
HE doesn& #39;t perceive what @realDonaldTrump did last night, so he tells ME that MY perceptions are faulty.
But he PROVES in his attempt to correct my double-plus ungood thinking that HE& #39;S wrong.
Trump& #39;s performance has to be taken as a whole.
Failing to take it as a whole means that you utterly fail to grasp the intent.
The Democrats now understand that their entire debate strategy is worthless.
Lying moderators are worthless.
What do the Democrats do NOW?
Failing to take it as a whole means that you utterly fail to grasp the intent.
The Democrats now understand that their entire debate strategy is worthless.
Lying moderators are worthless.
What do the Democrats do NOW?
If your opponent absolutely refuses to play by your dishonest rules, how do you score points?
As I said, the larger the paradigm shift, the longer it takes people to accept it.
Since John responded with condescension, and condescension is belligerence, he& #39;ll never grasp it.
As I said, the larger the paradigm shift, the longer it takes people to accept it.
Since John responded with condescension, and condescension is belligerence, he& #39;ll never grasp it.
What my ideas are, they aren& #39;t deserving of belligerence.
But people respond with belligerence because they feel threatened.
Working-class people, military people, cops, and those in the medical field view new ideas with curiosity.
But people respond with belligerence because they feel threatened.
Working-class people, military people, cops, and those in the medical field view new ideas with curiosity.
New ideas pique their interest.
This is because they aren& #39;t insecure.
Their families and their jobs provide them with a sense of worth, so they don& #39;t have a chip on their shoulder.
Academics, scientists, and white-collar workers tend to respond to new ideas with belligerence.
This is because they aren& #39;t insecure.
Their families and their jobs provide them with a sense of worth, so they don& #39;t have a chip on their shoulder.
Academics, scientists, and white-collar workers tend to respond to new ideas with belligerence.
This is because they& #39;re insecure.
They tend to have misplaced values and nothing tangible to give therm a sense of self-worth.
Science and academic theory are constantly changing.
White-collar work relies on changing laws and regulations.
What are their anchors?
They tend to have misplaced values and nothing tangible to give therm a sense of self-worth.
Science and academic theory are constantly changing.
White-collar work relies on changing laws and regulations.
What are their anchors?
So they come here to insult me.
The only reason they do that is to inflate their sense of self-worth.
The religious tend to not be afraid of new ideas.
They too are curious.
My guess is that John hasn& #39;t studied Trump at all.
I studied Trump daily for over a year.
The only reason they do that is to inflate their sense of self-worth.
The religious tend to not be afraid of new ideas.
They too are curious.
My guess is that John hasn& #39;t studied Trump at all.
I studied Trump daily for over a year.
When I said that Trump created a paradigm shift last night, it& #39;s because I know FROM STUDYING TRUMP and from following his presidency that his ENTIRE LIFE is dedicated to creating paradigm shifts.
Here& #39;s a perfect example:
Here& #39;s a perfect example:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iez2z2m0iUE">https://www.youtube.com/watch...
GUESS HOW THE ARMED FORCES DID THINGS IN THE PRE-TRUMP ERA?
They& #39;d have an issue--in this case the need for a bigger gun on infantry fighting vehicles.
FIRST they replace the aging system and ONLY THEN would they tinker with the replacement in order to address the issue that they knew would someday become a huge problem.
FIRST they replace the aging system and ONLY THEN would they tinker with the replacement in order to address the issue that they knew would someday become a huge problem.
The replacement system would not address that future issue.
Only when the system was replaced would the armed forces THEN tell the company to MODIFY the replacement to make it address that once-distant issue.
The system and the other problem were addressed SEPARATELY.
Only when the system was replaced would the armed forces THEN tell the company to MODIFY the replacement to make it address that once-distant issue.
The system and the other problem were addressed SEPARATELY.
As a result, new replacement system would be JUNKED, and we& #39;d have to start all over against from scratch.
As systems would be poorly modified to address and issue they were not designed to address.
As systems would be poorly modified to address and issue they were not designed to address.
THIS TIME, the army bought seven 50mm chain guns, gave one each to seven competitors, and told them, "Build the new infantry fighting vehicle around the gun."
A two-step issue was reduced to ONE STEP.
Guess whose idea THAT was?
AND IT WAS NEVER DONE BEFORE.
A two-step issue was reduced to ONE STEP.
Guess whose idea THAT was?
AND IT WAS NEVER DONE BEFORE.
Paradigm shift.
"Let& #39;s not get sucked into hyperbole."
The unspoken ending of that sentence is, "You dumb shit. I& #39;M the smart one in this here neck of the woods, so I& #39;LL do the talking."
I& #39;m sure John had no idea about the 50mm gun.
"Let& #39;s not get sucked into hyperbole."
The unspoken ending of that sentence is, "You dumb shit. I& #39;M the smart one in this here neck of the woods, so I& #39;LL do the talking."
I& #39;m sure John had no idea about the 50mm gun.
