Read on Twitter
I& #39;m regularly struck by how every day the Financial Times features advocacy for ideas that aren& #39;t stereotypically pro-business.
Often the FT seems as concerned about climate change, wealth inequality, bad epistemics in politics, under-investment in science and tech... 1/
Often the FT seems as concerned about climate change, wealth inequality, bad epistemics in politics, under-investment in science and tech... 1/
...and lack of aggregate demand as The Guardian. And its writers seem equally willing to endorse the taxes & spending necessary to fix them.
Of course part of this is just that FT journalists & readers are smart, informed people who care about things going well for the world. 2/
Of course part of this is just that FT journalists & readers are smart, informed people who care about things going well for the world. 2/
People aren& #39;t just walking bundles of class interests, they& #39;re individuals with moral agency.
But I think an underrated reason is that in the long term businesses can only thrive and make big profits when the whole of society is thriving. 3/
But I think an underrated reason is that in the long term businesses can only thrive and make big profits when the whole of society is thriving. 3/
Sure, any one individual business might benefit from some stupid policy like mandatory hairdresser licensing, the construction of a coal power plant, or a military arms race.
But not businesses as a whole. 4/
But not businesses as a whole. 4/
To the private sector as a group, giveaways to any individual business are just a drag on total production.
And sure, you might juice profits this year with a tax cut, but you can& #39;t keep cutting taxes every year — it& #39;s a trick that only gets you so far. 5/
And sure, you might juice profits this year with a tax cut, but you can& #39;t keep cutting taxes every year — it& #39;s a trick that only gets you so far. 5/
Considering things over the next 100 years the only way for businesses to make more profit is to have society as a whole flourishing, and total productivity rising as a result. 6/
That means the business sector needs:
• Stable, predictable, intelligent governance
• Voters who endorse the system of government they have, and aren& #39;t on the verge of revolt
• An educated, capable, and healthy workforce 7/
• Stable, predictable, intelligent governance
• Voters who endorse the system of government they have, and aren& #39;t on the verge of revolt
• An educated, capable, and healthy workforce 7/
• Every individual having enough wealth to invest in themselves and make the most of their talents
• A climate that isn& #39;t constantly destroying your infrastructure
• Staff who aren& #39;t poisoned daily by particulate pollution 8/
• A climate that isn& #39;t constantly destroying your infrastructure
• Staff who aren& #39;t poisoned daily by particulate pollution 8/
• Lots of new scientific research that can be used to raise productivity and generate entirely new business opportunities
• The absence of wars, as they& #39;re expensive, pull smart people out of the private sector, and otherwise interfere with production and trade 9/
• The absence of wars, as they& #39;re expensive, pull smart people out of the private sector, and otherwise interfere with production and trade 9/
• Social ills like drug addiction kept to a minimum
• Abundant housing so people can easily move where the productive jobs are
• Not having to waste money on bullshit jobs, e.g. lots of lawyers to protect against frivolous lawsuits thanks to a badly-designed legal system 10/
• Abundant housing so people can easily move where the productive jobs are
• Not having to waste money on bullshit jobs, e.g. lots of lawyers to protect against frivolous lawsuits thanks to a badly-designed legal system 10/
• Low levels of crime as it ruin the lives of staff, and reduces both trust and investment
• Allowing people to migrate from low-productivity to high-productivity countries
• People who want to have children can afford to do so and raise the next generation. 11/
• Allowing people to migrate from low-productivity to high-productivity countries
• People who want to have children can afford to do so and raise the next generation. 11/
It& #39;s easy to focus on ways the rich and the poor, or business-owners and their staff, have different interests.
But in the big picture they have much more in common than they have apart. 12/
But in the big picture they have much more in common than they have apart. 12/
