Read on Twitter
The quick roll had me 
but fathers being tender with their children always gets a RT from me. https://twitter.com/_mbk_juicemann/status/1311162693596917760
but fathers being tender with their children always gets a RT from me. https://twitter.com/_mbk_juicemann/status/1311162693596917760
Having had privilege of watching multiple âI have a child nowâ transformations of men in my own family over the yrs, I am more and more convinced that the answer to âHow do we get better/more noble men?â is at least **in part** âGive them babies and donât take those babies awayâ
What if (as feminists claim) we DO need men to be a bit more nurturing, sensitive, etc in order to have a good society?
And what if *the route to get them there* doesnât run through training/scolding (which obviously isnât working), but straight through family formation?
And what if *the route to get them there* doesnât run through training/scolding (which obviously isnât working), but straight through family formation?
Most men, unlike most women, generally HATE being tender/vulnerable in the public sphere. Know where they do so, and very much enjoy and gain from doing so? In the sheltered, private sphere.
The power to create that sphere, that space, is a substantial power.
The power to create that sphere, that space, is a substantial power.
This is, over and over, my primary critique of third wave feminism. It is not empowering - it is the wholesale rejection of feminine power, and an abandonment of our domain.
It is the elevation of the masculine as the only thing of value.
It is the elevation of the masculine as the only thing of value.
It is, furthermore, the reduction of all human M/F relationship to a flat, two-dimensional âpower dynamicâ wherein the only possible question to **even be asked** is âWhoâs on top?â
If that is the sole question your peabrain can conceive of, your answers are going to be WRONG.
If that is the sole question your peabrain can conceive of, your answers are going to be WRONG.
