The Internal Market Bill cleared the Commons yesterday

Lots of debate about the NI protocol, but it's really important not to lose sight of the original purpose: restricting post-Brexit policy divergence within the UK

Why is this important, and why is the UK govt doing it?

1/9
At first glance preventing trade barriers within the UK sounds like something everyone should agree on

But to understand why the bill's so controversial in the devolved areas, you need to appreciate it turns how devolution's worked since 1999 on its head

2/9
When New Labour introduced devo, the *whole point* was so Scotland, Wales & NI could do things differently from Westminster

Because of this, at the time little serious thought was given to restricting divergence and there was no concept of a 'UK internal market'

3/9
The UKIM Bill, in contrast, is motivated by a view that divergence is a dangerous threat to the integrity and economic performance of the UK

In effect, it super-imposes new arrangements designed to prevent divergence on top of a devolution system designed to facilitate it

4/9
These ideas haven't come from nowhere

There is a strong strand of thinking in today's Tory party that argues central govt's retreat from key policy fields in the devolved territories has undermined support for the Union, particularly in Scotland

5/9
Besides this, the bill is a manifestation of just how wide the differences between the UK's govts have become

UK ministers clearly don't believe they can achieve their policy aims through intergovernmental negotiation, which would have been far less contentious

7/9
In the Lords - where plenty of peers take a close interest in devo - these aspects will get much closer scrutiny. The relationship between the bill & IGR will probably also be explored in more depth

The final Act could yet be quite different from the current version

9/9
You can follow @ja_sheldon.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: