Read on Twitter
I don't think I would wish the unsolvable chaos that is #Brexit on my worst enemies.
Which is an irony, since it seems my worst enemies have wished it upon all of us.
Oh well. Does this mean you've finally run out of people to blame?
https://twitter.com/atatimelikethis/status/1310633118626349057
Which is an irony, since it seems my worst enemies have wished it upon all of us.
Oh well. Does this mean you've finally run out of people to blame?
https://twitter.com/atatimelikethis/status/1310633118626349057
What should we call this horror?
Not HS2 mishandling
Yet huge money was burned
Laws broken
Previous PMs libelled
Peace process and US trade risked
Countless lies
Anywhere else this is simply fraud. Banged up.
Somehow for Johnson it's free speech? WTF? https://twitter.com/atatimelikethis/status/1310635090909835264?s=19
Not HS2 mishandling
Yet huge money was burned
Laws broken
Previous PMs libelled
Peace process and US trade risked
Countless lies
Anywhere else this is simply fraud. Banged up.
Somehow for Johnson it's free speech? WTF? https://twitter.com/atatimelikethis/status/1310635090909835264?s=19
Remember UK plc?
It starts a project called #Brexit. After 4.5 years a new CEO is found to have wasted billions, lied, then hidden evidence worsening problems.
At the AGM he says shareholders can do bugger all about it. He may or may not move on in 5 years. His call.
They vote.
It starts a project called #Brexit. After 4.5 years a new CEO is found to have wasted billions, lied, then hidden evidence worsening problems.
At the AGM he says shareholders can do bugger all about it. He may or may not move on in 5 years. His call.
They vote.
If that CEO is Prime Minister and UK plc is UK?
You have a month to prove he issued contracts for personal benefit.
Once the Internal Market Bill passes. Clauses 46 and 47 legalise bribery if undertaken by a minister.
You have a month to prove he issued contracts for personal benefit.
Once the Internal Market Bill passes. Clauses 46 and 47 legalise bribery if undertaken by a minister.
That's odd, what's a huge expansion of ministerial power doing in a bill meant to deal with a Northern Ireland problem?
Good thought. What else is there?
42 and 43 What about a massive transfer of sovereignty from the people to the Government cutting out Parliament?
State Aid
Good thought. What else is there?
42 and 43 What about a massive transfer of sovereignty from the people to the Government cutting out Parliament?
State Aid
Jeez, really? But it's so much text, are you done?
Nope, no one bothered with the fine print of the Withdrawal Agreement. So we should expect the same right?
Let's go for a hat trick.
How about we make sure that no major laws can ever touch a Prime minister or cabinet again?
Nope, no one bothered with the fine print of the Withdrawal Agreement. So we should expect the same right?
Let's go for a hat trick.
How about we make sure that no major laws can ever touch a Prime minister or cabinet again?
Exaggeration. That's nuts!
Hmm.
1. Their record for legal compliance?
2. Why not make this safe? Add time limits and reviews; sovereignty respected.
Why would you NOT?
3. All Democracies have Executive subject to judicial review.
Sovereignty improves removing that because...?
Hmm.
1. Their record for legal compliance?
2. Why not make this safe? Add time limits and reviews; sovereignty respected.
Why would you NOT?
3. All Democracies have Executive subject to judicial review.
Sovereignty improves removing that because...?
This is Brexit related, so now the world divides.
Remainers point at Leavers saying "we told you so"
Leavers, if they were told about this by their Newspapers (so far they haven't been) are immediately provoked by remainers to back this.
Whatever Brexit meant. It wasn't this.
Remainers point at Leavers saying "we told you so"
Leavers, if they were told about this by their Newspapers (so far they haven't been) are immediately provoked by remainers to back this.
Whatever Brexit meant. It wasn't this.
We're all leavers now, even if some wish to be rejoiners.
Our country might want to exclude Pharaohs & arbitrary executions
The nice Mr Mogg claimed Parliamentary Sovereignty derived from the people. Let's help him honour that eh?
However you voted. This is fine print time.
Our country might want to exclude Pharaohs & arbitrary executions
The nice Mr Mogg claimed Parliamentary Sovereignty derived from the people. Let's help him honour that eh?
However you voted. This is fine print time.
