So ACB has a damn impressive record on the 4th Amendment.
https://reason.com/2020/09/23/amy-coney-barrett-thinks-the-second-amendment-prohibits-blanket-bans-on-gun-possession-by-people-with-felony-records/
And">https://reason.com/2020/09/2... hopeful signs on qualified immunity https://reason.com/2020/09/23/amy-coney-barrett-demolishes-the-qualified-immunity-claim-of-a-detective-who-framed-a-man-for-murder/
I& #39;m">https://reason.com/2020/09/2... not with her on the rational basis test, but I know my view is the minority ... for now ... https://reason.com/2020/09/24/amy-coney-barrett-and-the-problem-of-conservative-judicial-deference/">https://reason.com/2020/09/2...
https://reason.com/2020/09/23/amy-coney-barrett-thinks-the-second-amendment-prohibits-blanket-bans-on-gun-possession-by-people-with-felony-records/
And">https://reason.com/2020/09/2... hopeful signs on qualified immunity https://reason.com/2020/09/23/amy-coney-barrett-demolishes-the-qualified-immunity-claim-of-a-detective-who-framed-a-man-for-murder/
I& #39;m">https://reason.com/2020/09/2... not with her on the rational basis test, but I know my view is the minority ... for now ... https://reason.com/2020/09/24/amy-coney-barrett-and-the-problem-of-conservative-judicial-deference/">https://reason.com/2020/09/2...
But if judiciary grills her on rational basis, it& #39;s silly bc they usually DEMAND this view from judges. Which is fine, but if they grill her and turn towards a @RandyEBarnett view for reals I& #39;m here for it
Also most of my links will be @reason bc they sum up my larger thoughts in a readable way!
Also worth noting she seems like Kavanaugh-level of judge in certain ways. Very focussed on maintaining judicial stability but also moving gently in the future direction of jurisprudence
Also worth noting she seems like Kavanaugh-level of judge in certain ways. Very focussed on maintaining judicial stability but also moving gently in the future direction of jurisprudence
I& #39;ve seen more judges open their hearts to 4A, 9A/14A, and just questioning govt more seriously in more cases, but slowly. She seems one of those judges. Nothing wrong with it but I prefer @JusticeWillett -style no-nonsense. But she IS a very normal judge.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21453067/amy-coney-barrett-potential-nominee-supreme-court
From">https://www.vox.com/policy-an... what I& #39;ve seen of her work, I tend to agree with @kewhittington here -
From">https://www.vox.com/policy-an... what I& #39;ve seen of her work, I tend to agree with @kewhittington here -
This alone is encouraging and noteworthy: "It is clear from Barrett& #39;s record that she does not reflexively side with the government in criminal cases." https://reason.com/2020/09/21/scotus-contender-amy-coney-barretts-mixed-record-in-criminal-cases/">https://reason.com/2020/09/2...
Again - this makes her a typical judge https://reason.com/2018/07/03/scotus-short-lister-amy-coney-barrett-on/">https://reason.com/2018/07/0... but I prefer @JusticeWillett to the norm. But to suggest she& #39;s any radical is plainly asinine.