But if judiciary grills her on rational basis, it& #39;s silly bc they usually DEMAND this view from judges. Which is fine, but if they grill her and turn towards a @RandyEBarnett view for reals I& #39;m here for it
Also most of my links will be @reason bc they sum up my larger thoughts in a readable way!

Also worth noting she seems like Kavanaugh-level of judge in certain ways. Very focussed on maintaining judicial stability but also moving gently in the future direction of jurisprudence
I& #39;ve seen more judges open their hearts to 4A, 9A/14A, and just questioning govt more seriously in more cases, but slowly. She seems one of those judges. Nothing wrong with it but I prefer @JusticeWillett -style no-nonsense. But she IS a very normal judge.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/21453067/amy-coney-barrett-potential-nominee-supreme-court

From">https://www.vox.com/policy-an... what I& #39;ve seen of her work, I tend to agree with @kewhittington here -
None of this means you HAVE to agree with confirming her, but I think it& #39;s vital to understand who she is and who she isn& #39;t. She& #39;s a very normal judge with some encouraging signs.
You can follow @senatorshoshana.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: