The outrage was about the fact that innocent horses were attacked. You spent your piece making comparisons but not once addresses the topic at hand. How is it that you manage to address the people reporting on it but not once address the issue of the mob who attacked the horses? https://twitter.com/ChrisRoper/status/1309027995160543234">https://twitter.com/ChrisRope...

But wait, I assume there were no knobkerries, bats and pangas used... these wounds were made with "magic". Despite the fact that countless eyewitnesses report seeing these weapons you decide to double down on the narrative that there were none. Go figure.