Company leaders are desperate for owners. Someone to OWN outcomes.

What @rabois calls barrels, and what Frank Slootman calls drivers.

Sales does this naturally (the outcome is their number)

But I believe PMs should own (or co-own) all business outcomes.

1/6
Think of PMs on a spectrum:

on one extreme, PMs = project management, "scrum master" bullshit, shipping software

on the other extreme you have PMs = "the CEO/GM of the product area", shipping OUTCOMES

The CEO/GM framing is the correct one

PMs are GMs

2/6
This does not necessarily mean must own a full P&L (although happens)

but you must own an OUTCOME

and that outcome does not have to be revenue

3/6
what this means in practice is you chop up all outcomes & divvy them across your PMs.

At Divvy, 9 PMs own:

-Contribution margin (3 PMs)
-Net retention
-CAC /Payback
-Monthly revenue (co-own w/ sales)
-Ramping of customers (co-own w/ sales)
-Signup volume (co-own w/ sales)

4/6
You can follow @thogge.
Tip: mention @twtextapp on a Twitter thread with the keyword “unroll” to get a link to it.

Latest Threads Unrolled: