PUAs and nightclub sociopaths aren't "alpha males" - their machiavellian scheming is only possible in an utterly feminized society.

It is far more accurate to describe them as "matriarchy navigators", people who are adept at navigating fem-centric social structures

Concepts like "re-framing", "plausible deniability", this stuff only works within a social context where violence is off the table, and considered 'beyond the pale'

where you can act like a snide, machiavellian piece of shit, as long as you do so in a 'plausibly deniable' way

Because no-one can technically PROVE that you're being a machiavellian piece of shit, and in the feminized social context that is anti-confrontational, all about 'keeping the good vibes going', anyone who challenges you can easily be re-framed as 'taking things personally'

2 PUAs go up to a couple, one distracts the guy, the other begins running 'boyfriend destroyers' on the girl, mocking the boyfriend - it is only in a feminized social context in which you could get away with this. It's not a small thing, it's a vicious and sociopathic attack

but if the boyfriend challenges the situation, they can just accuse him of 'being defensive', and then re-frame the situation so that HE is the one receiving a talking to about his 'possessiveness' and 'male jealousy'

If he challenges them he is creating a 'bad vibe', the only way he can counter is by out-playing them by operating his own machiavellian schemes, i.e pretending that they're being genuine, then either move chairs around or take his girl somewhere else while staying 'cool'

so he can get her away from them, or create a situational context where any further escalation from them WOULD cross the line of 'plausible deniability' at which point HE could frame their behavior as predatory - whatever he does it must also operate on the same level

Imagine trying PUA shit in ancient Sparta, or even countries like Dagestan today?

*I'm going to go up to this couple and brazenly start hitting on the woman, if the guy challenges me I'll just accuse him of being jealous, no-one will be able to TECHNICALLY PROVE otherwise*

No-one would accept that, because these are social contexts dominated by male animus, there's no taboo about confrontation, you could just challenge the guy 'What the fuck are you doing? Are you trying to pick her up?'

He responds with a smug facial expression, while bumping

you aside as if you're not there, resuming talking to your girl, trying to pick her up - you could openly confront him 'Why the fuck are you standing between us? What was that smug facial expression, I've just asked you if you're trying to hit on my girl, what's your response?"

All other men seeing this would back you up, 'Yeah, what the fuck are you doing?", at which point he could either back down or you could escalate the situation into violence - violence that the police would side with YOU on because they themselves think like you

But in the feminized social context we live in, in the modern nightclub, the whims of women rule - women, who hate open confrontation and prefer machiavellian positioning as their default conflict resolution, to be 'sociable' you effectively have to also operate on this level

People who hate this kind of high-mach communication tend to be those who form their own cliques, who are seen as losers by the mainstream, because the method of operation in mainstream 'socializing' is just so underhanded it disturbs their natural predisposition to honesty

The modern social structure SELECTS for those who are most adept at this kind of snide communication, what some would call 'power-talk'

So you get nightclub operators who wear a cool jacket, have mastered 'holding a glass of ciroc in a cool way', and go around acting like

underhanded sociopathic scum. Those to whom the truth of words or of life means NOTHING, they are therefore those who are most adept at 're-framing' everything to their benefit, because underlying reality doesn't mean anything to them

They have a hyper-vigilant awareness of the social context, ALWAYS with an eye on manipulating it to their advantage. Those who have integrity and are honest are disgusted, but in order to get by, are often forced to go toe to toe with scum like this

Modern women actually find this 'ability to operate on this underhanded machiavallian level' attractive. This is what a 'smooth' guy ultimately is, some dickhead with a leather jacket and medallion operating with ruthless efficiency but pretending he's 'just chilling'

A good example of fem-centric social navigation is how the big brother contestants reacted to @ofwudan Andrew Tate calling them out for being two-faced, in this video.

He calls them out, what is their response?

42seconds, One girl in shorts does a dance move, says "Go Flex and ???", immediately another one copies her. A group of socially influential people walk away, everyone who was sat still now has to be part of this 'cool group', and join them walking away, they do so

Notice the total lack of actual engagement with what he's saying? In a masculine social context a smug dance move and then walking away without cogently responding would rightly be seen as evasion and cowardice. Again, imagine shit like this occurring in ancient Sparta..?

1:08- they all join a big group hug, to stress 'you're not with us', Tate comes over to talk, the girls immediately respond by putting fingers in ears and "LaLalala" - high school machiavellian female social tactics

Notice the man-bun guy with tattoos - as he copies them?

He's the exact kind of matriarchy-navigator I'm talking about. He senses what way the social winds are blowing - the girls say Lalala, so he copies them and emphasizes it, with glee in his eyes. The extent to which he is 'cool' is the extent to which he behaves like this

Immediately after he does this, the other matriarchy-navigator in the leather jacket copies him, except he does so even more loudly

The group all then move away, sadistically enjoying 'othering' Tate, with visible glee in their faces. The stragglers who aren't part of the

core group are then faced with the social pressure of where to go, they want to be 'cool' so follow the cool group out of panic.

All of this is done consciously by the socially influential people, the 'fashionable' girls and the men that copy them. Their purpose is to humiliate

Tate then challenges them in a masculine way of saying exactly what he means - their response is yet again, more snide machiavellianism, 'Just calm down!', one even says 'We don't like your vibe' - which is one of the most common tactics of this kind of person

And this is ESSENTIALLY THE NORM in the western 'nightlife' world, where sociopathic operators like this rule. Nightclub promoters, dancers, bouncers, 'the cool party guy', people like Tekashi 6/9 or G-Eazy, they are all ADEPTS at this underhanded snideness

They are a social menace, they are single-handedly responsible for massive increases in STDs, their hatred of bad vibes or 'logic' leads them to have reckless unprotected sex because 'condoms' are 'male logic' suggestive of control, they're not emotionally resonant

In this sphere when people talk of the bad results of feminism, they're often obsessing over divorce courts or alimony

But in reality it is more subtle, it is the normalization of a fem-centric method of communication that allows underhanded and dishonorable behavior to flourish

and creates a social context in which those who are MOST underhanded and full of shit, rise to the top, as their lack of honor opens up the possibility for an ENTIRE SUITE of behaviors that a person who respects the truth of situations, just isn't able to commit

The nightclub operator is a glaring example because nightclubs are essentially the most fem-centric environment out there, but this is also the case in HR departments, universities, and increasingly in day to day social life

The extent to which you can deal with scumbags like this depends on i) how machiavellian you can be in manipulating the social context or ii) how much incentive you can create for people to NOT attack you in this way through social proof or fame

i.e someone like Conor McGregor probably COULD call out a sociopathic nightclub operator because there is a social power, from his fame, to respect what he says. 'Othering' a guy like McGregor is a harder sell, high-mach operators like this know this, you try to

'other' McGregor and he can easily OTHER YOU, by insulting you, people will side with him because of his social proof, so generally dickheads like this would try to INGRATIATE to McGregor, knowing the power he has. Again, they have a HYPER VIGILANT AWARENESS of social dynamics

But for any normal person, who respects the truth and has virtues like honor, unfortunately you are forced to deal with scum like this.

I use the example of ancient Sparta, to me it really is glaring how far we've fallen. That video above, situations like that just WOULD NOT

happen in a society like that, this strata of person would be ostracized, seen as being low-honor and shunned by the tribe. THEY would feel social pressure to not be a piece of shit.

We have advanced technologically but in reality we have fallen.

An entire suite of dishonorable behaviors is now the social norm, and to be 'sociable' you too must act this way.

The modern PUA is the distilled version of all of this - underhanded dishonorable males who have adapted best to matriarchal social structures. They are NOT alpha