It turns out Twitter can be a bit biased with what it focuses on in its image previews.
Let& #39;s see which brands it prefers.
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="🤔" title="Denkendes Gesicht" aria-label="Emoji: Denkendes Gesicht">
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="đź‘€" title="Augen" aria-label="Emoji: Augen">
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👇" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach unten" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach unten"> THREAD
https://abs.twimg.com/emoji/v2/... draggable="false" alt="👇" title="Rückhand Zeigefinger nach unten" aria-label="Emoji: Rückhand Zeigefinger nach unten">
Let& #39;s see which brands it prefers.
This brand vs. brand experiment was all in good fun, but the implications in other situations are raising eyebrows. @PatrickKulp explains why it seems like Twitter image previews could have racial bias built into them. https://adweek.it/33Lgxil ">https://adweek.it/33Lgxil&q...