I love digging in to methods, but a thing I& #39;m really noticing: a lot of beloved ones (e.g. Braun and Clarke& #39;s thematic analysis) go so far into the "how to think" piece that it becomes borderline ableist. Not everyone is neurotypical, not everyone thinks in the same order/way.

TBH, this is part of my deep love for/obsession with constructivist grounded theory - the back-and-forth supports my ADHD mind, and the way Charmaz wrote it up it& #39;s clear that there are a bunch of valid ways to think through a grounded theory problem.

Anyway, if you& #39;re writing up a methods piece, and someone tells you that you have to spell out an exact style of thinking which can not be violated..... ignore them, you& #39;re talking to a bad scientist who is also maybe sorta a jerk.

(I& #39;m not writing up a methods piece rn, this is general guidance)