Read on Twitter
Quite a few references to Autism. Given that they account for up to 30% of kids presenting with Gender Identity Issues you would think an Autistic charity would be alarmed. They are. But about the wrong issues. 
The Consultation document uses the captured language of the Lobby Groups. Many people reject the implicit assumption of “Gender Identity Ideology” inherent in the nomenclature of “CisGender”. Stonewall peddling its adherence to the new Social Engineering. of society. .
.
Cant believe they didn’t do any Due Diligence on the bonkers Action For Trans Health group. Here observing and recording biological sex is described as “Gender labels are forcibly applied to children at birth”. No alarm bells ringing with this turn of phrase? None!
Gatekeeping of access to medical transition for people with autism is a repeated theme. Reminder that females, with Autism, are over-represented x 8 in referrals with Gender Identity Issues. Many adult females, with autism, have expressed concern about this.
Quoting the wild view that some people associate your sex (they use “Gender” with your genitals. And why on earth are Barnardos getting involved? Good to know a children’s charity thinks we should accept women with male genitalia. #Safeguarding?
Good to know a children’s charity thinks we should accept women with male genitalia. #Safeguarding?
I would love to know who these so-called “Women’s Rights Organisations” are. Normally you get access to submissions when they go to a Parliamentary Enquiry. Will we get them for this consultation?
Scottish Trans Alliance who think a statutory declaration is a serious enough document to declare you are really a “woman/man”. A solemn vow? Nope. Women are not an “identity”.
Stonewall also going for SelfID by StatDec. No surprise there. Nice tough with the “cap in hand asking for state approval”. I note they are as sloppy with their spelling as they are with their due diligence.
This Union, however, is worried that a Trans Person may be prosecuted for making a false declaration if reported by “anti-trans” organisations. The Union movement has been a disgrace on this issue. Bad tactic to inform us they are meaningless as we rarely prosecute for lying.
Mermaids having a bit of a laugh with their concern about data breaches!
Now Amnesty International weighing in re transing kids. . Children have a right to grow up and not be medicalised to the point of sterility when they may simply be Lesbians, Gay Males, Autistic or girls in flight from their sex cos SEXism.
. Children have a right to grow up and not be medicalised to the point of sterility when they may simply be Lesbians, Gay Males, Autistic or girls in flight from their sex cos SEXism.
And of course Mermaids want easy access for 16/17 year olds and a “process” for under 16s to access Legal Gender Recognition. No mention of Parental Duty of Care either.
Another reference to neuro divergence & mental health issues and how it should not be a barrier to medicalisation. For parents of Autistic kids.
Here the authors of the consultation use the phrase “Pregnant Persons who are not Women”. & “People who bear children”.
Which sex would that be then?
Which sex would that be then?
Here a transsexual expresses concern about men using the process to access women’s spaces. The comment below is mangling language to such an extend that I *think* they mean I can still want sex with women when I am one? But i am not sure.
Here a respondent demands that we do away with the term Mother and replace it with “Birth Parent” not just for the sex denial it’s but for EVERYONE! Narcissistic Trans Totalitarianism !
A sensible response raising the real danger that Institutional Homophobia may be a factor in rising rates of Confused, likely future gay, adults.
English Cricket Board whose Trans Policy allows males to play as women.
More on sport. Can’t quite believe we all now have to pretend Males competing in FEMALE sports only *might* be unfair.
Clear statement on CURRENT law which allows males to be excluded from sex segregated spaces for women. The emphasis on “very strong reason” is the authors. It is enough that women don’t want males in their spaces that’s a VERY STRONG REASON? Women say NO!
More on women’s spaces. I notice that the use of “older women” crops up a lot as if young women and girls don’t count. I suspect this is because so many are totally indoctrinated and this is reflected in the responses. Also here we are called “non trans women”.
