Read on Twitter
I'm sorry everyone's upset about @IFTTT going pro, but I've ALWAYS been an IFTTT fanboy. I absolutely LOVE IFTTT, and I always have. When my #SmartHome friends wanted to code and script their connections, I just used IFTTT in seconds did the same things they did. -- 1 of many
In fact my entire smart home design is built upon many different integrations with IFTTT. With their move to the pro platform I can't wait to see what other things I can do, but I'm MOST excited about their multi-account, multi-step, and conditional features. -- 2 of many
I kind of wish that @Yubico and @IFTTT would come together and have a little IFTTT baby or something. Could you imagine the amazingness that would come out of integrating hard core 2FA through home automation? I love IFTT and the integrations, but security has -- 3 of many
been on the forefront of my mind. Imagine for a second, a door lock that requires not only your key code or presence at home, but also a yubikey for 2FA? Amazing, and I think it'd work too. -- 4 of many
With conditional steps and loops, as well as scripting options, I simply don't understand how you could have a smarthome and not include IFTTT in some way.
But I have another issue that I'm not sure @IFTTT can handle. let's see in the next tweet in this conversation. --5 of many
But I have another issue that I'm not sure @IFTTT can handle. let's see in the next tweet in this conversation. --5 of many
I would like to see if it's possible for @IFTTT to incorporate a truly "incognito mode". Privacy matters too! And while we users love the interconnectedness, we're also absolutely mortified by the lack of privacy in our #IOT devices. Privacy is crucial & big Question --6 of many
Can @IFTTT partner with @mozilla, a champion of privacy, and together bring forth the movement of privacy that IOT required, desires, and NEEDS? Imagine, being able to automate your life, without BIG Tech knowing about it? --7 of many
What people don't realize with IFTTT going pro, is that IFTTT is essentially the middle-man between the end user and the products we know and love. If we're having issues, there's a better chance of IFTTT getting through than there is for us. This is huge, why? --8 of many
Because by IFTTT being the middle-man, we have a potential of getting the things we actually want. Like @TwitterSupport actually. Why, WHY is there a 25 tweet limit? Can IFTTT work with Twitter and raise that, especially now that we're paying pro for it? --9 of many
Something I heard Mr. Tibbets say in an interview of going Pro. You want end-users to be able to set it up and forget it's even there. Sir, I don't think this mindset works when it comes to smart homes specifically. There's always something to tinker with, and things --10 of many
always break or need batteries changed. New automations are setup, and new ideas are spread. I'd rather IFTTT be in the forefront of those ideas than not heard. I've been in the middle of it with the developers of MegaVoiceCommand. It's easier to use IFTTT, but --11 of many
Coding and scripting always took a front seat, and if something broke, my IFTTT always ran, was always reliable, and always worked. My entire smart home runs off IFTTT, and it's gonna need some love constantly to function right. --12 of 13
And with that I want to say a huge THANK YOU to @ifttt and @ltibbets for continuing to make IFTTT amazing. You guys are amazing, and thank you for listening to us end users (no one ever does). While you're at it, please do read the rest of this thread. Good ideas! Thanks <3 13/13
