Read on Twitter
I& #39;m sorry everyone& #39;s upset about @IFTTT going pro, but I& #39;ve ALWAYS been an IFTTT fanboy. I absolutely LOVE IFTTT, and I always have. When my #SmartHome friends wanted to code and script their connections, I just used IFTTT in seconds did the same things they did. -- 1 of many
In fact my entire smart home design is built upon many different integrations with IFTTT. With their move to the pro platform I can& #39;t wait to see what other things I can do, but I& #39;m MOST excited about their multi-account, multi-step, and conditional features. -- 2 of many
I kind of wish that @Yubico and @IFTTT would come together and have a little IFTTT baby or something. Could you imagine the amazingness that would come out of integrating hard core 2FA through home automation? I love IFTT and the integrations, but security has -- 3 of many
been on the forefront of my mind. Imagine for a second, a door lock that requires not only your key code or presence at home, but also a yubikey for 2FA? Amazing, and I think it& #39;d work too. -- 4 of many
With conditional steps and loops, as well as scripting options, I simply don& #39;t understand how you could have a smarthome and not include IFTTT in some way.
But I have another issue that I& #39;m not sure @IFTTT can handle. let& #39;s see in the next tweet in this conversation. --5 of many
But I have another issue that I& #39;m not sure @IFTTT can handle. let& #39;s see in the next tweet in this conversation. --5 of many
I would like to see if it& #39;s possible for @IFTTT to incorporate a truly "incognito mode". Privacy matters too! And while we users love the interconnectedness, we& #39;re also absolutely mortified by the lack of privacy in our #IOT devices. Privacy is crucial & big Question --6 of many
Can @IFTTT partner with @mozilla, a champion of privacy, and together bring forth the movement of privacy that IOT required, desires, and NEEDS? Imagine, being able to automate your life, without BIG Tech knowing about it? --7 of many
What people don& #39;t realize with IFTTT going pro, is that IFTTT is essentially the middle-man between the end user and the products we know and love. If we& #39;re having issues, there& #39;s a better chance of IFTTT getting through than there is for us. This is huge, why? --8 of many
Because by IFTTT being the middle-man, we have a potential of getting the things we actually want. Like @TwitterSupport actually. Why, WHY is there a 25 tweet limit? Can IFTTT work with Twitter and raise that, especially now that we& #39;re paying pro for it? --9 of many
Something I heard Mr. Tibbets say in an interview of going Pro. You want end-users to be able to set it up and forget it& #39;s even there. Sir, I don& #39;t think this mindset works when it comes to smart homes specifically. There& #39;s always something to tinker with, and things --10 of many
always break or need batteries changed. New automations are setup, and new ideas are spread. I& #39;d rather IFTTT be in the forefront of those ideas than not heard. I& #39;ve been in the middle of it with the developers of MegaVoiceCommand. It& #39;s easier to use IFTTT, but --11 of many
Coding and scripting always took a front seat, and if something broke, my IFTTT always ran, was always reliable, and always worked. My entire smart home runs off IFTTT, and it& #39;s gonna need some love constantly to function right. --12 of 13
