well well ...

"The Duchess of Sussex’s lawyers have issued a scathing dismissal of claims in her biography as “extremely anodyne”, “the product of creative licence” or “inaccurate” as they insist she could not have cooperated with its authors." https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2020/09/22/duchess-sussexs-lawyers-issue-scathing-dismissal-finding-freedom/

"A second witness statement from Ms Afia has now detailed a selection of examples from the book she says are inaccurate or “easily found in the public domain”.

“The vast majority of these are either extremely anodyne and/or I understand are the product of creative licence and/or are inaccurate.

“It is also debatable as to whether the examples paint the Claimant [Meghan] in a good light as claimed.”

"Other elements of the book “come from material in the public domain”, including articles published by the MoS itself"

A detail about the Duchess’s security training ahead of the wedding came from The Sun, papers state, adding that she was “in fact, not offered this training”.

"Others are simply incorrect, they claim, citing a description of the Duchess sending her father Thomas Markle,“a final message”.

“This is evidently not correct as the Claimant has,in this case, provided the full exchanges between her and her father in the run up to the wedding”

“Her last message to him was on 17 May 2018 at 12.26. It follows that the rest of that section of the Book, which refers to the Claimant calling a friend on FaceTime from the bath and talking about the “final message” to her father, is also incorrect.”