Read on Twitter
You ever have interactions with people online and genuinely wonder if they’re selectively illiterate, or just purposely misunderstanding you?
TBC: there IS empirical evidence that circumcised men are significantly less likely to contract HIV. (See tweets below
)
TBC: there IS empirical evidence that circumcised men are significantly less likely to contract HIV. (See tweets below
)
My final words before muting that shit + the info & SS I shared:
Link: https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/?fbclid=IwAR28V5EBQMrHMef4QVa3XE_4JNVID5SCTPxYr7FdWYZ5HDyRhlQqUn6xNDU
Link: https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/?fbclid=IwAR28V5EBQMrHMef4QVa3XE_4JNVID5SCTPxYr7FdWYZ5HDyRhlQqUn6xNDU
I literally shared that screenshot + the link in the very next comment following my initial comment, to be clear.
I never said anything about hygiene, because “hygiene” isn’t even the reason why male circumcision helps prevent HIV/AIDS, and thus not a medical justification.
I never said anything about hygiene, because “hygiene” isn’t even the reason why male circumcision helps prevent HIV/AIDS, and thus not a medical justification.
I’m still not over the fact that I got called antisemitic because I don’t generally support circumcising your son, whilst also being accused of supposedly advocating for circumcision over teaching hygiene lmao
But mostly I’m just baffled by the blatant lack of nuance & the straight up denial of actual facts in this thread.
Like, do people realize more than one thing can be true at the same time?
Like, do people realize more than one thing can be true at the same time?
